Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah is facing significant public and political backlash following the approval of a ₹2.6 crore renovation project for his official residence. The planned upgrades include constructing a new helper's room with an attached bathroom, additional storage spaces, enhanced lighting, and improved water facilities. This expenditure has drawn sharp criticism, especially given the state's current financial constraints and recent hikes in essential service costs.

Critics have labeled the residence as a "Sheeshmahal," drawing parallels to a recent controversy involving former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. In that case, a Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report revealed that over ₹33 crore was spent on renovating Kejriwal's official residence, far exceeding the initial estimate of ₹7.9 crore. The renovations included luxury items such as ₹70 lakh televisions and a ₹20 lakh spa, leading to widespread public outcry and an investigation by the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC).

The term "Sheeshmahal" has since become synonymous with government extravagance, and its use in the context of Siddaramaiah's residence suggests a perception of misallocated public funds. The opposition has seized upon this issue, questioning the necessity and timing of such expenditures when the state is purportedly facing economic challenges.

In response to the criticism, the Karnataka government has defended the renovation, stating that the upgrades are essential for the maintenance and functionality of the official residence. However, the public discourse continues to focus on the appropriateness of such spending, especially in light of recent controversies surrounding government officials' use of public funds for personal luxuries.

This situation highlights the ongoing debate over fiscal responsibility and transparency in government expenditures, particularly concerning the use of public funds for officials' residences and amenities.