Government Examines 2% Transaction-Based Contribution for Gig Worker Welfare

The Indian government is considering a 2% transaction-based levy on digital aggregators to finance social security benefits for more than 12 million gig and platform workers, marking a significant development in efforts to extend formal welfare protection to India's expanding platform economy.

The proposal, reported on November 4, 2026, would require eligible aggregators to contribute towards a dedicated Social Security Fund based on transactions associated with gig-worker services rather than their total business turnover.

The proposed arrangement is intended to create a more equitable contribution mechanism for companies operating different digital business models.

The National Social Security Board, constituted in late October, is expected to examine the proposal during a meeting in the second half of November.

The government is considering introducing the social security programme in 2027, although the contribution formula, eligibility conditions and implementation schedule have not been finalised.

The proposed benefits include life insurance, disability protection, accident insurance, healthcare and maternity support.

Pension, provident fund and other retirement-related benefits may be introduced at a later stage.

The initiative could affect businesses operating across food delivery, quick commerce, ride-hailing, logistics and other platform-based services.

However, the 2% transaction levy remains under consideration and has not been announced as a final, operational charge.

Key Highlights of the Proposed Gig Worker Social Security Scheme

Particulars

Details

Proposed policy

Transaction-based social security contribution

Contribution rate under consideration

2%

Proposed contributors

Eligible digital aggregators

Intended beneficiaries

Gig and platform workers

Estimated workforce in FY2025–26

12 million

Proposed funding mechanism

Social Security Fund

Government contribution under reported proposal

None

Worker contribution under reported proposal

None

Initial benefits

Life, disability, accident, health and maternity protection

Possible later benefits

Pension and provident fund

Decision-making body

National Social Security Board

Expected next review

Second half of November 2026

Potential implementation

2027

Legislative framework

Code on Social Security, 2020

Current status

Under consideration

The final structure will depend on government decisions, statutory requirements and the detailed rules governing the scheme.

Why the Government Is Considering a Transaction Levy

The proposal follows discussions over how digital aggregators should contribute towards the welfare of workers who provide services through their platforms.

India's gig economy includes several distinct business models.

Food delivery platforms facilitate orders and delivery services.

Ride-hailing companies connect passengers with drivers.

Quick-commerce businesses combine digital ordering, warehousing and delivery operations.

Other platforms provide logistics, home services and specialised work.

These businesses do not necessarily calculate revenue or turnover in the same way.

A contribution based on total company turnover could therefore create different financial burdens across platforms.

Industry representatives have raised concerns about such differences.

The government is consequently examining a transaction-based approach intended to link contributions more directly to economic activity attributable to gig workers.

How the Proposed 2% Transaction Levy Could Work

Under the reported proposal, aggregators would contribute towards social security based on qualifying transactions connected with gig-worker services.

The approach differs from a broad levy calculated on an aggregator's entire annual turnover.

For example, a platform may generate revenue from subscriptions, advertising, commissions and other business activities.

Not all these revenue streams are necessarily attributable to gig work.

A transaction-based mechanism could seek to identify the portion directly associated with services performed by platform workers.

However, the government has not finalised the precise calculation base.

It remains unclear whether the contribution would apply to gross transaction values, platform revenue attributable to gig services or another defined measure.

Consequently, a proposed 2% levy should not be interpreted as an automatic 2% charge on every customer's total order value.

The eventual financial impact will depend on the detailed rules.

Transaction-Based Levy Versus Turnover-Based Contribution

Feature

Transaction-Based Approach Under Consideration

Existing Statutory Turnover Framework

Calculation basis

Qualifying gig-related transactions or revenue

Aggregator annual turnover

Rate

2% under discussion

1%–2%, as notified

Main policy objective

Link contribution to gig-related activity

Finance social security for platform workers

Treatment of unrelated business revenue

May be excluded under the proposed approach

Governed by statutory turnover definition

Worker-payment safeguard

Final mechanism pending

Contribution capped at 5% of amounts paid or payable to gig workers

Implementation

Not finalised

Subject to applicable notification and rules

The Code on Social Security, 2020, establishes the legal framework for aggregator contributions. The government must ensure that the final transaction-based mechanism is consistent with that framework.

National Social Security Board to Examine Final Scheme

The National Social Security Board will play an important role in developing and overseeing the welfare framework.

The government notified the board on October 30, 2026, under the Code on Social Security.

It is chaired by the Union Minister for Labour and Employment and includes representatives of government, industry, workers and other stakeholders.

The board is responsible for recommending social security schemes and advising on their administration.

It also has responsibilities relating to monitoring welfare programmes and reviewing the use of funds.

The board is expected to meet in the second half of November to consider the proposed contribution mechanism.

However, its deliberations do not automatically create a binding levy.

The government will need to finalise the necessary scheme provisions and implementation arrangements.

Why the National Social Security Board Matters

The establishment of the board creates a formal institutional mechanism for gig-worker welfare.

Previously, discussions concerning social security for platform workers involved multiple stakeholders and policy processes.

The board brings these interests into a structured framework.

Its membership includes representatives of major digital platforms and worker organisations.

This could help policymakers examine both the financial implications for businesses and the practical needs of workers.

The board will also need to consider how benefits should be delivered.

Eligibility verification, registration, contribution collection and claims administration will be important implementation challenges.

The effectiveness of the proposed programme will depend on how these systems operate in practice.

India's Gig Workforce Reaches 12 Million

India's gig economy has expanded substantially over the past several years.

The estimated number of gig workers increased from 7.7 million in FY2020–21 to approximately 12 million in FY2025–26.

This represents growth of roughly 56% over five years.

The expansion reflects increasing use of app-based delivery, transport, logistics and other services.

Digital platforms have created flexible earning opportunities and new forms of employment.

However, many workers do not receive the same employer-linked benefits commonly associated with formal salaried jobs.

These can include paid leave, employer-supported insurance and retirement savings.

The proposed social security programme seeks to address part of this protection gap.

Growth of India's Gig Workforce

Estimated gig workforce in India

Millions of workers; FY2029–30 is a projection

Chart
 

India's gig workforce is projected to reach 23.5 million by FY2029–30, underscoring the importance of establishing scalable welfare arrangements.

Social Security Benefits Expected Under the Scheme

The proposed framework is expected to provide several forms of protection.

Initial benefits may include life and disability insurance, accident coverage, healthcare and maternity support.

These protections could help workers manage financial risks associated with illness, injury or loss of earning capacity.

For delivery workers and drivers, accident-related protection is particularly relevant because their work often involves road travel.

Healthcare coverage could reduce the financial burden of medical treatment.

Maternity support may help address welfare gaps affecting eligible women platform workers.

However, the scope of coverage, benefit amounts, exclusions and claims procedures have not yet been finalised.

Workers should not assume that the reported proposal creates immediate entitlement to any specific benefit.

Proposed Gig Worker Welfare Benefits

Benefit

Intended Purpose

Current Position

Life insurance

Financial protection following a worker's death

Proposed

Disability insurance

Support following qualifying disability

Proposed

Accident insurance

Protection against work-related and other covered accidents

Proposed

Health benefits

Assistance with eligible medical expenses

Proposed

Maternity benefits

Support for eligible workers

Proposed

Pension

Retirement income protection

Possible later phase

Provident fund

Long-term savings support

Possible later phase

Other old-age benefits

Financial protection in later life

Possible later phase

The government has not announced the final benefit values or coverage terms.

Pension and Provident Fund Benefits May Come Later

Retirement protection remains an important concern for gig workers.

Unlike many salaried employees, platform workers may not have access to regular employer-linked retirement contributions.

However, pension and provident fund arrangements require long-term financing and reliable records of worker participation.

The government is reportedly considering introducing these benefits after the initial insurance and healthcare programme.

One consideration is the duration of workers' association with digital platforms.

Gig workers may move between companies or participate intermittently.

A retirement scheme must therefore account for changing work arrangements.

The government has not announced a confirmed timetable for pension or provident fund benefits.

Scheme Could Be Funded Entirely by Aggregators

Under the arrangement currently being discussed, the Social Security Fund would be financed by contributions from aggregators.

The reported proposal does not envisage direct contributions from the central government or gig workers.

This would place the principal funding responsibility on digital businesses that use platform labour.

However, the final rules will determine which aggregators must contribute and how liabilities are calculated.

The Code on Social Security permits different funding arrangements for welfare schemes.

These include government financing, aggregator contributions and combinations of permitted sources.

The proposal to rely entirely on aggregators therefore represents a policy choice under consideration rather than the only arrangement allowed by law.

Code on Social Security Provides Legal Foundation

The Code on Social Security, 2020, formally recognises gig workers and platform workers.

It provides for social security schemes covering life and disability protection, accident insurance, healthcare, maternity benefits and old-age protection.

Section 114 addresses welfare schemes for these categories of workers.

The law also establishes provisions concerning contributions from aggregators.

Under the statutory framework, aggregator contributions may be notified at a rate between 1% and 2% of annual turnover.

The contribution is subject to a ceiling of 5% of the amount paid or payable by the aggregator to gig and platform workers.

The government is now considering how to operationalise this framework in a manner that accounts for differences between platform business models.

Eligibility May Depend on Days Worked

Eligibility is another important component of the proposed programme.

The Code on Social Security provides for minimum work-duration conditions for access to relevant benefits.

A gig worker may qualify by working at least 90 days during a financial year with a single aggregator.

Alternatively, workers associated with multiple aggregators may qualify by completing at least 120 days in aggregate during the financial year.

These conditions are intended to establish a minimum level of participation in platform work.

However, their practical application will require reliable records.

Workers may undertake assignments across several platforms, sometimes simultaneously.

The government will need mechanisms to verify qualifying work without creating unnecessary administrative burdens.

Gig Worker Eligibility Framework

Employment Pattern

Minimum Work Requirement

Work with one aggregator

90 days in a financial year

Work across multiple aggregators

120 days cumulatively in a financial year

These are statutory eligibility conditions relevant to the social security framework. The final scheme will determine the detailed verification and benefit-access procedures.

Food Delivery and Quick-Commerce Platforms Could Be Affected

Food delivery and quick-commerce companies depend heavily on platform-based delivery workers.

A social security contribution linked to gig-related transactions could create additional operating expenses.

Companies may need to account for these costs when planning pricing, commissions and delivery operations.

However, the financial impact will depend on the final contribution base.

A levy calculated on platform revenue would have different implications from one calculated on the full value of customer orders.

The distinction is particularly important for businesses that sell products while also providing delivery services.

The government is examining a model intended to avoid disproportionate burdens between different types of aggregators.

Ride-Hailing Platforms Face Similar Considerations

Ride-hailing platforms connect passengers with drivers who may operate independently or through other commercial arrangements.

The proposed contribution mechanism could affect the economics of these services.

However, the impact will depend on how qualifying revenue is defined.

A platform that earns commissions on rides may have a different revenue structure from a company operating a delivery or retail business.

The government is considering these differences while designing the scheme.

Ride-hailing platforms may also need to strengthen worker identification and activity records.

Accurate data will be important for determining both contribution liabilities and worker eligibility.

Impact on Major Digital Platform Categories

Platform Category

Potential Implication

Food delivery

Additional social security contribution obligations

Quick commerce

Need to identify gig-related transaction revenue

Ride hailing

Contribution linked to qualifying platform activity

Logistics aggregators

Worker registration and contribution compliance

Home-service platforms

Eligibility tracking for service professionals

Digital marketplaces

Scope depends on final aggregator definitions

Multi-service platforms

More complex revenue attribution

Platform workers

Potential access to insurance and welfare benefits

No company-specific contribution liability has been announced.

Will Consumers Pay More for Digital Services?

The proposed levy could raise questions about whether digital platforms will increase customer charges.

If aggregators face additional costs, they may consider adjustments to commissions, delivery fees or other commercial arrangements.

However, passing costs on to customers is not automatic.

Companies may absorb part of the expense through operating efficiencies or changes in profitability.

Competitive conditions will also influence pricing decisions.

Importantly, the government has not finalised the calculation mechanism.

It would therefore be premature to estimate a specific increase in delivery fees, ride fares or service charges.

The eventual consumer impact will depend on the final rules and individual business decisions.

Digital Aggregators May Need New Compliance Systems

The scheme could create additional reporting and administrative requirements for platforms.

Aggregators may need to identify qualifying workers, calculate contributions and maintain records of relevant transactions.

They may also need to share information with government systems responsible for welfare administration.

Platforms operating multiple services could face additional complexity in separating gig-related revenue from other income.

Technology systems may need to support contribution calculations and worker eligibility verification.

However, the government has not announced the final compliance procedures.

Businesses will need to await detailed notifications before determining implementation costs.

e-Shram Portal Could Support Worker Registration

The e-Shram portal is an important component of India's unorganised worker registration infrastructure.

The Ministry of Labour and Employment launched the platform in August 2021.

It provides a national database for unorganised workers, including gig and platform workers.

Registered workers receive a Universal Account Number.

The government introduced an aggregator module in December 2024 to facilitate registration of platforms and associated workers.

Major aggregators, including food delivery, transport and logistics companies, have been onboarded.

The portal could support the administration of future gig-worker benefits.

However, the exact integration between e-Shram, contribution collection and claims processing will depend on the final scheme design.

Why Portability of Benefits Matters

Gig workers frequently work with more than one platform.

Some may change companies based on demand, location or earning opportunities.

Others may combine platform work with different forms of employment.

A social security scheme linked too closely to one company could create gaps in coverage.

Portable benefits would allow eligible workers to maintain protection as they move between platforms.

However, portability requires consistent identification, contribution records and eligibility verification.

The proposed framework will need to address these operational challenges.

The 120-day cumulative eligibility condition for workers using multiple platforms makes reliable data coordination particularly important.

Financial Implications for India's Platform Economy

The proposed contribution mechanism could influence operating costs across India's digital economy.

For platforms with large numbers of active workers, even a relatively small contribution rate may create a meaningful annual expense.

However, the amount cannot be calculated accurately without knowing the final levy base.

Companies with different revenue models may face different financial effects.

Investors will assess whether the contribution can be absorbed within existing margins.

They may also examine how the policy affects pricing, worker retention and business expansion.

The longer-term impact could depend on whether improved social security helps create a more stable workforce.

Potential Benefits for Workers and Businesses

Stakeholder

Potential Benefit

Implementation Challenge

Gig workers

Insurance and healthcare protection

Eligibility verification

Aggregators

More structured worker welfare framework

Additional financial contributions

Government

Expanded social security coverage

Administration and monitoring

Consumers

Potentially more stable service workforce

Possible pricing changes

Insurance providers

Expanded coverage opportunities

Claims management

Digital platforms

Improved worker engagement

Compliance and data systems

Labour organisations

Formal welfare framework

Effective worker representation

The actual benefits will depend on the final design and execution of the programme.

India's Gig Economy Could Reach 23.5 Million Workers by 2030

India's gig economy is expected to expand substantially over the coming years.

NITI Aayog has projected that the number of gig workers could reach 23.5 million by FY2029–30.

This would represent approximately 6.7% of the country's workforce.

The expansion reflects increasing adoption of digital platforms across transport, logistics, delivery and professional services.

However, the growth of platform work also raises questions about income security and social protection.

Traditional employment benefits are often linked to formal employer-employee relationships.

Gig work can involve more flexible arrangements.

The proposed social security programme seeks to address this difference through a dedicated welfare framework.

Industry Concerns Centre on Fairness and Cost Allocation

A major issue in the discussions is how contributions should be distributed across different platform business models.

Some aggregators primarily earn commissions.

Others generate revenue from product sales, subscriptions, advertising or service charges.

A uniform levy on total turnover could therefore affect companies differently.

Industry participants have argued that the contribution should reflect the economic activity directly associated with gig workers.

The proposed transaction-based approach seeks to address this concern.

However, determining the appropriate transaction base may be technically complex.

The government will need to balance fairness, simplicity and administrative feasibility.

Worker Protection Could Strengthen the Digital Economy

Social security can provide important protection against unexpected financial shocks.

For workers who depend on daily or weekly earnings, accidents and illness can interrupt income.

Insurance and healthcare benefits may reduce some of these risks.

More reliable welfare arrangements could also improve confidence in platform work.

However, social security alone does not resolve every challenge facing gig workers.

Issues such as earnings volatility, working hours, occupational safety and grievance mechanisms remain relevant.

The proposed programme represents one component of a broader labour welfare framework.

Its success will depend on whether benefits are accessible, affordable and effectively administered.

What Happens Next?

The National Social Security Board is expected to meet in the second half of November 2026.

Its deliberations will be important for finalising the proposed contribution structure.

The government will also need to determine the scope of covered aggregators and the calculation methodology.

Other important issues include eligibility verification, fund administration, benefit design and claims processing.

The scheme could be introduced in 2027, according to the reported policy discussions.

However, no final implementation date has been formally established through the proposal.

Until the government issues the necessary rules and notifications, the 2% transaction-based contribution should be treated as a proposal rather than an operative requirement.

Key Developments to Monitor

Development

Significance

National Social Security Board meeting

Review of proposed framework

Final contribution formula

Determines aggregator liabilities

Definition of qualifying transactions

Establishes the calculation base

Notification of covered aggregators

Clarifies affected businesses

Worker eligibility procedures

Determines access to benefits

Social Security Fund arrangements

Establishes collection and administration

Insurance and healthcare scheme details

Defines actual welfare protection

Implementation notification

Confirms commencement

Platform compliance guidelines

Establishes reporting obligations

Benefit portability rules

Supports workers using multiple platforms

Outlook for Gig Worker Social Security in India

The proposed transaction levy represents an important development in India's efforts to establish a more comprehensive social security framework for platform workers.

The government appears to be moving towards a contribution mechanism that accounts for differences between aggregator business models.

The proposed funding arrangement could create a dedicated source of support for insurance and healthcare benefits.

However, several important questions remain unresolved.

These include the exact contribution base, financial impact on aggregators, benefit eligibility and implementation arrangements.

The National Social Security Board's forthcoming deliberations will be central to the next phase.

The long-term success of the programme will depend on balancing worker protection with the commercial sustainability of digital platforms.

Conclusion

The Indian government is considering a 2% transaction-based levy on digital aggregators to finance social security benefits for more than 12 million gig and platform workers.

The proposal aims to link contributions more closely to gig-related economic activity rather than applying a uniform calculation to total business turnover.

The National Social Security Board is expected to examine the framework during the second half of November 2026.

Initial benefits could include life and disability insurance, accident coverage, healthcare and maternity support.

Pension and provident fund benefits may be considered later.

The scheme is reportedly being designed around contributions from aggregators, without direct funding from the central government or workers.

However, the levy remains under consideration, and the final contribution formula has not been announced.

For India's platform economy, the proposal could establish a more formal system of worker protection while creating new financial and compliance responsibilities for digital businesses.

The central policy challenge will be ensuring that the programme delivers meaningful benefits without imposing disproportionate costs across different aggregator models.